Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:16

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Colorado confirms 3 more infections in airport-linked measles outbreak - CIDRAP
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What should every American know before traveling to the UK?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How do I express sarcasm in non-dialogue text when writing a fiction novel?
What’s next?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why is Laura Loomer considered a controversial figure within the conservative media ecosystem?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is it true that all men want a woman who looks like an Instagram “model”?